Level 2 - Basic Quality Assessment

Check if the applicant is experienced in the main selected topic of the project, e.g., the applicant or partners have a good track record for delivering the outputs:

• This will be checked based on the information provided in part 6 of the general information.

Check if the proposal meets the specific eligibility and quality criteria for the selected topic.

• This will be checked based on the information provided in the excellence, impact and implementation section.

Assess the collaborative approach; the cooperation with TETTRIs consultants, specialists or trainers is planned in the project in line with the specific descriptions of the Topics :

• This will be assessed based on the information provided in part 8 of the excellence section

Assess the described outcomes related to the expected outcomes as described in the Topics:

• This will be assessed based on the instructions in the topic descriptions, excellence and impact section

Assess the practical impact described in the proposal:

• This will be assessed based on the information provided in part 10 of the impact section

Assess the proposed stakeholder engagement towards the practical impact.

• This will be assessed based on the information provided in part 11 of the impact section

Check/conform to the ethics grid, gender equality and diversity.

• This will be checked based on the information provided in the ethics section and part 12 of the impact section

Level 3: Advanced Quality assessment

1. Excellence (30/100%)

The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work and the work described in the work programme are aligned:

• Clarity of the project’s objectives, and the extent to which the proposed work is ambitious, and goes beyond the state of the art.
• Sufficiency and competence of the collaborative approach, and how the collaboration with TETTRIs consultants will be hosted in an efficient manner.
• Soundness of the proposed methodology, including the underlying concepts, models, assumptions, appropriate consideration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content.

2. Impact (40/100%)

The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the description in the work programme:

• Credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme of the proposal, and the likely scale and significance of the results foreseen.
• Suitable approach to implement stakeholder engagement and to reach practical impact, considering the support of gender balance, inclusive activities and including citizen science.
• Suitability and quality of the measures to maximise expected outcomes and impacts, as set out in the dissemination and communication plan.

3. Quality and efficiency of the implementation (30/100%)

The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the description in the work programme:

• Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, and appropriateness of the effort assigned to work packages, and the resources overall.
• Capacity and role of each participant, and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise.
• Efficient budget distribution considering the activities within the project and the expertise necessary for the implementation of actions.